top of page

The Neuroscience of Belief

Aug 11

5 min read

29

Can belief change the brain? We often think of beliefs as private thoughts, ideas about the world, ourselves, or something greater. But neuroscience shows they’re far more than opinions. Beliefs can actively shape how the brain works and, in some cases, even change its physical structure.

From altering what we see to influencing emotions, decisions, and even the wiring of brain networks, belief leaves a measurable mark. This article explores some of the lesser-known ways it does so, going beyond the familiar example of the placebo effect.


Belief Shapes What We See

The brain isn’t a passive camera recording reality. It’s a prediction machine, constantly guessing what’s about to happen and checking those guesses against incoming sensory data, a process called predictive coding (Barron et al., 2020).

What we expect can quietly influence what we perceive. Studies show expectations can alter activity in sensory brain regions, from the thalamus to the visual cortex (Rotem Botvinik-Nezer et al., 2025). Sometimes this means we process expected sights more efficiently; other times, the brain sharpens details it thinks are important.

In one study, volunteers were trained to expect certain visual patterns. Even after the patterns stopped appearing, brain scans revealed their brains still responded as though they were there (Yon et al., 2023). As Dr Daniel Yon put it: “Our beliefs continue to shape activity in our brains, even when our old expectations no longer come true” (Yon et al., 2023).


Long-Term Beliefs and Brain Structure

Some beliefs are held for years, even a lifetime. Whether it’s a religious faith, political ideology, or belief in personal growth, these can leave lasting physical traces in the brain.

Research has linked intense, life-changing religious experiences to reduced hippocampal volume, a region vital for memory and emotion (Owen et al., 2011; Newberg, 2025). This may be due to chronic stress rather than the belief itself.

But other belief-driven practices can strengthen the brain. Long-term meditation — often rooted in a belief in its value is linked to thicker brain regions involved in attention and sensory processing (Lazar et al., 2005; Calderone et al., 2024). These benefits appear strongest in older meditators, suggesting that belief-driven mental habits may help preserve brain health with age.


Self-Belief and Learning

Beliefs about ourselves can be especially powerful. Consider the “growth mindset” the belief that abilities can improve with effort. Students with this mindset show stronger brain responses to mistakes, focusing on what went wrong and how to improve (Dweck & Yeager, 2019).

Over time, this mindset strengthens brain networks linked to learning and self-control. In contrast, a fixed mindset, believing abilities are static, is linked to minimal brain response to errors, which reduces growth opportunities (Zeng, 2025).


Belief and Emotion

Beliefs also shape how we handle stress. Feeling in control, even if the control is limited, can reduce activity in fear-related brain regions such as the amygdala, while increasing activity in the frontal cortex, which supports coping (Kenwood et al., 2021).

This helps explain why telling yourself “I can do something about this” can feel calming. It’s not just a comforting thought; it’s a measurable brain response.


How Beliefs Bias Decisions

Our brains tend to favour information that confirms what we already believe, a tendency called confirmation bias. When we encounter belief-consistent information, the brain’s reward circuits light up, making it feel satisfying (Korteling et al., 2023; Simply Psychology, 2025).

Memory also plays along. The ventromedial prefrontal cortex tags belief-consistent details as relevant and stores them more readily (Aly, 2020). This makes our memories efficient but biased, and it’s one reason changing our minds can be so hard.


Why Beliefs Can Be Hard to Change

Changing a belief means rewiring the brain networks that support it, something the brain resists (Simply Psychology, 2025). Stability helps us avoid overreacting to every new piece of information, but it can also keep false beliefs alive.

In extreme cases, such as certain psychiatric conditions, belief-updating circuits may be impaired. For example, patients with damage to frontal and parietal areas became more rigid in their religious beliefs and less able to revise them (Zhong et al., 2017; Cristofori et al., 2022).

For most people, beliefs shift gradually either as evidence builds or through a conscious choice to stay open-minded. This openness is thought to rely on the prefrontal cortex (Asp et al., 2013).


The Takeaway

Beliefs aren’t just ideas floating in our heads; they’re active forces shaping perception, emotion, memory, and even brain structure. The brain gives rise to belief, but belief also shapes the brain in return.

This two-way relationship means that changing our beliefs can, quite literally, change our brains. The stories we tell ourselves aren’t only psychological; they’re biological, training the neural circuits that guide how we see, think, and feel.


References

Aly, M. (2020). Brain Dynamics Underlying Memory for Lifetime Experiences. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(10), 780–781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.06.010


Asp, E., Manzel, K., Koestner, B., Denburg, N. L., & Tranel, D. (2013). Benefit of the doubt: a new view of the role of the prefrontal cortex in executive functioning and decision making. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2013.00086


Barron, H. C., Auksztulewicz, R., & Friston, K. (2020). Prediction and memory: A predictive coding account. Progress in Neurobiology, 192, 101821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2020.101821


Calderone, A., Latella, D., Impellizzeri, F., Pasquale, P. de, Famà, F., Quartarone, A., &

Calabrò, R. S. (2024). Neurobiological Changes Induced by Mindfulness and Meditation: A Systematic Review. Biomedicines, 12(11), 2613–2613. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12112613


Cristofori, I., Cohen-Zimerman, S., Bulbulia, J., Gordon, B., Krueger, F., & Grafman, J. (2022). The neural underpinning of religious beliefs: Evidence from brain lesions. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2022.977600


Dweck, C. S., & Yeager, D. S. (2019). Mindsets: A view from two eras. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(3), 481–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691618804166


Kenwood, M. M., Kalin, N. H., & Barbas, H. (2021). The prefrontal cortex, pathological anxiety, and anxiety disorders. Neuropsychopharmacology, 47(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-021-01109-z


Korteling, Johan. E. (Hans), Paradies, G. L., & Sassen-van Meer, J. P. (2023). Cognitive bias and how to improve sustainable decision making. Frontiers in Psychology, 14(1129835). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1129835

Lazar, S. W., Kerr, C. E., Wasserman, R. H., Gray, J. R., Greve, D. N., Treadway, M. T.,


McGarvey, M., Quinn, B. T., Dusek, J. A., Benson, H., Rauch, S. L., Moore, C. I., & Fischl, B. (2005). Meditation experience is associated with increased cortical thickness. Neuroreport, 16(17), 1893–1897. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.wnr.0000186598.66243.19

Memory Bias and Belief Bias May Share a Common Brain Mechanism. (2025, July 9). Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/memory-bias-and-belief-bias-may-share-a-common-brain-mechanism.html


Moser, J. S., Schroder, H. S., Heeter, C., Moran, T. P., & Lee, Y.-H. (2011). Mind your errors: Evidence for a neural mechanism linking growth mind-set to adaptive posterror adjustments. Psychological Science, 22(12), 1484–1489. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611419520


Newberg, A. (2025). Religious Experiences Shrink Part of the Brain. Jefferson Digital Commons. https://jdc.jefferson.edu/jmbcimfp/5/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Owen, A. D., Hayward, R. D., Koenig, H. G., Steffens, D. C., & Payne, M. E. (2011). Religious Factors and Hippocampal Atrophy in Late Life. PLoS ONE, 6(3), e17006. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017006


Rotem Botvinik-Nezer, Geuter, S., Lindquist, M. A., & Wager, T. D. (2025). Expectation generation and its effect on subsequent pain and visual perception. PLoS Computational Biology, 21(5), e1013053–e1013053. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013053


Yon, D., Thomas, E., Gilbert, S. J., Floris, Kok, P., & Press, C. (2023). Stubborn Predictions in Primary Visual Cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 35(7), 1133–1143. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01997


Zeng, H. (2025). Neural Correlates of Growth Mindset: A Scoping Review of Brain-Based Evidence. Brain Sciences, 15(2), 200–200. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15020200


Zhong, W., Cristofori, I., Bulbulia, J., Krueger, F., & Grafman, J. (2017). Biological and cognitive underpinnings of religious fundamentalism. Neuropsychologia, 100, 18–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.04.009

Aug 11

5 min read

0

29

© 2024 by NeuroFlutter

  • Screenshot 2024-07-25 at 00.27.37
  • Instagram-logo-icon-social-media-hand-drawn-png_edited
  • 2095e5a15212107b74264dc094f67391
bottom of page